Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4?
Date
Msg-id 18629.1259703003@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4?  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4?  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Some people consider the extended support and easy upgrades of the RHEL5 
> versions valuable enough that they have a strong preference to use the 
> version of PostgreSQL that ships with it.  Right now, when such people 
> ask me about using 8.1 in that context, I tell them while it would be 
> better if they ran something more recent, the performance of that 
> version is reasonable and the bugs they might run into aren't that 
> serious.  This is not the case at all for either 7.4 or 8.0, which have 
> been completely indefensible as versions to consider deploying for quite 
> some time already.

Well, actually, if it's just "what will RH support", I just today got
launch commit on this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489479
which might change things a bit.  PG 8.1 will be *in* RHEL5 until 2014,
but whether many people will still be using it is another question.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Next
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4