Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, it ignores it if libxml2 isn't available. It can be built with
>> or without libxslt though.
> ugh.
> Maybe we need to set up a dummy function or two if not building with
> xslt, like we do with the XML functions if not building with libxml.
Right, that was exactly my proposal. The function should be there
always, but throw a run-time error if no xslt support.
regards, tom lane
