Re: Todays git migration results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Todays git migration results
Date
Msg-id 18568.1281982272@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Todays git migration results  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Todays git migration results  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Attached is a ZIP file with the diffs generated when converting the
> cvs repo to git based off a cvs snapshot from this morning. It
> contains a diff file for every branch and every tag present. (If a
> file is missing, that means there were no diffs for that branch/tag).

> It's a lot of diffs - 135. But many of those are because the exact sam
> ething is in all tags on a branch. The directory "unique" contains one
> copy of a unique set of diffs (doesn't look at the individual changes,
> just the complete diff file), which is "only" 30 different files.

> As before, almost everything seems related to the initial import and
> vendor branch. There is nothing in any code.

I'm curious about the discrepancies in the $Date$ tags in some of the
doc/FAQ_xxx files.  It's surely not a showstopper, but I'd feel better
if we understood the cause of that.  Everything else seems to be
disagreement about the vendor branch version numbers, which I'm happy
to write off as a conversion artifact.

The other thing that I'd like to see some data on is the commit log
entries.  Can we produce anything comparable to cvs2cl output from
the test repository?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Triggers on VIEWs
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Git migration timeline