Re: [HACKERS] Reducing pg_ctl's reaction time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Reducing pg_ctl's reaction time
Date
Msg-id 18520.1498508356@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Reducing pg_ctl's reaction time  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Reducing pg_ctl's reaction time  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> The 10 fold increase in log spam during long PITR recoveries is a bit
> unfortunate.

> 9153  2017-06-26 12:55:40.243 PDT FATAL:  the database system is starting up
> 9154  2017-06-26 12:55:40.345 PDT FATAL:  the database system is starting up
> 9156  2017-06-26 12:55:40.447 PDT FATAL:  the database system is starting up
> 9157  2017-06-26 12:55:40.550 PDT FATAL:  the database system is starting up
> ...

> I can live with it, but could we use an escalating wait time so it slows
> back down to once a second after a while?

Sure, what do you think an appropriate behavior would be?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reducing pg_ctl's reaction time
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reducing pg_ctl's reaction time