Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2013-07-25 09:48:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The proposed patch seems a bit overcomplicated --- isn't the real
>> problem that I changed the ordering of the header probes in
>> be4585b1c27ac5dbdd0d61740d18f7ad9a00e268? I think I just alphabetized
>> them in a fit of neatnik-ism, not realizing that there were order
>> dependencies on some platforms.
> Hm. It very well might be too complicated. I am not exactly a autoconf
> expert...
Ah, I was thinking that AC_CHECK_HEADERS would include the
previously-found headers when checking a particular item, but a bit of
research says that's not so. So we do indeed need something like this.
Will take care of it.
regards, tom lane
