Re: Inserts and bad performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Inserts and bad performance
Date
Msg-id 185058.1637782313@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Inserts and bad performance  ("Godfrin, Philippe E" <Philippe.Godfrin@nov.com>)
Responses RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inserts and bad performance  ("Godfrin, Philippe E" <Philippe.Godfrin@nov.com>)
List pgsql-general
"Godfrin, Philippe E" <Philippe.Godfrin@nov.com> writes:
> I am inserting a large number of rows, 5,10, 15 million. The python code commits every 5000 inserts. The table has
partitionedchildren. 
> At first, when there were a low number of rows inserted, the inserts would run at a good clip - 30 - 50K inserts per
second.Now, after inserting oh say 1.5 Billion rows, the insert rate has dropped to around 5000 inserts per second. I
droppedthe unique index , rebuilt the other indexes and no change. The instance is 16 vcpu and 64GB ram. 

Can you drop the indexes and not rebuild them till after the bulk load is
done?  Once the indexes exceed available RAM, insert performance is going
to fall off a cliff, except maybe for indexes that are receiving purely
sequential inserts (so that only the right end of the index gets touched).

Also see

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/populate.html

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Godfrin, Philippe E"
Date:
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inserts and bad performance
Next
From: Gavin Roy
Date:
Subject: Re: Inserts and bad performance