Re: Adding CI to our tree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date
Msg-id 184c7dae-c750-3834-43c2-1316e6efc5ac@proxel.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding CI to our tree  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Adding CI to our tree
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/21/21 5:55 PM, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 17:05, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>>> It's not like this forces you to use cirrus or anything. For people that don't
>>> want to use CI, It'll make cfbot a bit more effective (because people can
>>> adjust what it tests as appropriate for $patch), but that's it.
> 
> I don't disagree on that part, but I fail to see what makes the
> situations of an unused CI config file in the tree and an unused
> `/.idea/` or `/.vs/` specifier in the .gitignore [0][1] distinct
> enough for it to be resolved differently. Both are quality-of-life
> additions for those that use that tool, while non-users of that tool
> can ignore those configuration entries.

There is a better solution to that. Just add those files to the global 
gitignore on your machine. You will want to ignore those files in all 
git repositories on your machine anyway. On the other hand the 
configuration files for the CI are relevant to just the PostgreSQL repo.

Andreas



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeremy Schneider
Date:
Subject: Re: relation OID in ReorderBufferToastReplace error message
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Drop replslot after pgstat_shutdown cause assert coredump