Re: search_path vs extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: search_path vs extensions
Date
Msg-id 18458.1243459516@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: search_path vs extensions  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: search_path vs extensions  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Wait, I thought we'd given up on the search path model and wanted to 
> track extensions via dependencies.  No?

I think what this discussion is about is trying to gauge just what
amount of support we could give someone who insisted on dropping each
extension into a different schema.  It's not really related to how
we track which objects belong to which extension.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up
Next
From: Caleb Welton
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] plpythonu datatype conversion improvements