RE: WAL & RC1 status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthew
Subject RE: WAL & RC1 status
Date
Msg-id 183FA749499ED311B6550000F87E206C1FD037@srv.ctlno.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to WAL & RC1 status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

> From:    Bruce Momjian [SMTP:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent:    Friday, March 02, 2001 9:54 AM
> To:    Tom Lane
> Cc:    pgsql-core@postgresql.org; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] WAL & RC1 status
> 
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > Is there a version number in the WAL file?
> > 
> > catversion.h will do fine, no?
> > 
> > > Can we put conditional code in there to create
> > > new log file records with an updated format?
> > 
> While it may be unfortunate to have to do an initdb at this point in
the beta cycle, it is a beta and that is part of the deal.  Postgre has the
reputation of being the highest quality opensource database and we should do
nothing to tarnish that.  Release it when it's ready and not before.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL & RC1 status
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [ODBC] Re: Release in 2 weeks ...