Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Date
Msg-id 18394.1005272237@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> It would be nice if we had a more general system
> for adding keywords and having them be column label/function name
> capable.  Right now I know I need to add to keyword.c but I have no idea
> if/when I need to add to the keyword list in gram.y.

*Every* new keyword should be in one of the keyword lists in gram.y.

I tried to clean up the documentation of which list does which and why
in the proposed patch --- what do you think of it?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification