David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, 18 Sept 2025 at 15:37, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +# Test that EState.es_part_prune_infos is properly set in EvalPlanQualStart()
>> +# Bug #19056
> I don't think it's that useful to note down the bug number that caused
> that test to be added.
We're inconsistent about whether we do that or not, but it's
far from un-heard-of. I just today pushed a patch in which
I did mention the bug# in the test case [1], and I did so
mostly because the adjacent test case had a similar comment.
So I see no reason to object to Amit's usage.
> I think it'd be better to write something like:
> "Exercise run-time partition pruning code in an EPQ plan"
Not expressing an opinion about whether that's better or
worse than Amit's lede.
regards, tom lane
[1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=b0cc0a71e0a0a760f54c72edb8cd000e4555442b
