Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 2:03 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hmm ... yeah, these test cases are not large enough to exercise any
>> lossy-page cases, are they? I doubt we should try to make a new regression
>> test that is that big. (But if there is one already, maybe we could add
>> more test queries with it, instead of creating whole new tables?)
> I've checked that none of existing tests for GIN can produce lossy
> bitmap page with minimal work_mem = '64kB'. I've tried to generate
> sample table with single integer column to get lossy page. It appears
> that we need at least 231425 rows to get it. With wider rows, we
> would need less number of rows, but I think total heap size wouldn't
> be less.
> So, I think we don't need so huge regression test to exercise this corner case.
Ugh. Yeah, I don't want a regression test case that big either.
v15 looks good to me.
regards, tom lane
