Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Date
Msg-id 18327.1584983119@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> ... all plan types that use only one child use the outer one.  They
> could use either, as long as it does that consistently, I think.

Yeah, exactly.  The outer/inner terminology is really only sensible
for join nodes, but there isn't a third child-plan pointer reserved
for single-child node types, so you gotta use one of those.  And
conventionally we use the "outer" one.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10
Next
From: James Coleman
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)