Re: Extension Packaging - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Extension Packaging
Date
Msg-id 18298.1303682105@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extension Packaging  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: Extension Packaging  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Apr 24, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> IMO it'd be better if the bug fix level was tracked outside the
>> database, for instance via an RPM package version/release number.
>> I'm not sure whether PGXN has anything for that at the moment.

> Distributions may have their own versions independent of the versions of the extensions they contain. Is that
sufficient?

Hmm ... it's sufficient, but I think people are going to be confused as
to proper usage if you call two different things the "version".  In RPM
terminology there's a clear difference between "version" and "release";
maybe some similar wording should be adopted here?  Or use "major
version" versus "minor version"?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Extension Packaging
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Extension Packaging