Re: ps buffer is incorrectly padded on the (latest) OS X - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ps buffer is incorrectly padded on the (latest) OS X
Date
Msg-id 18282.1283699185@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ps buffer is incorrectly padded on the (latest) OS X  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 04/09/10 22:41, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So we don't need a version check unless you're worried about somebody
>> trying to run Postgres 9.x on OS X 10.2 (which was retired in 2003).

> What happens if someone does? Crash, or just wonky ps output? If it's 
> the latter, seems safe to backpatch.

Wonky ps output.  I don't recall exactly how wonky, but back in the day
it looked better blank-padded.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY