Re: Fixing GIN for empty/null/full-scan cases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fixing GIN for empty/null/full-scan cases
Date
Msg-id 1826.1294450150@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fixing GIN for empty/null/full-scan cases  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Jan 7, 2011, at 4:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, actually, I just committed it.  If you want to test, feel free.
>> Note that right now only the anyarray && <@ @> operators are genuinely
>> fixed ... I plan to hack on tsearch and contrib pretty soon though.

> Hrm, the queries I wrote for this sort of thing use intarray:

>     WHERE blah @@ '(12|14)'::query_int

> That's not done yet though, right?

Right.  Maybe sometime this weekend.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing GIN for empty/null/full-scan cases
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: More pg_upgrade clarifications