Re: SQL-standard function body - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SQL-standard function body
Date
Msg-id 1825656.1617865082@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL-standard function body  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SQL-standard function body
List pgsql-hackers
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:33:20PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Nothing special, really. Surprised the BF doesn't see it:

> Is think this is because the buildfarm client is running installcheck for the
> contribs rather than check, and pg_stat_statements/Makefile has:
> # Disabled because these tests require "shared_preload_libraries=pg_stat_statements",
> # which typical installcheck users do not have (e.g. buildfarm clients).
> NO_INSTALLCHECK = 1

No, because if that were the explanation then we'd be getting no
buildfarm coverage at all for for pg_stat_statements.  Which aside
from being awful contradicts the results at coverage.postgresql.org.

I think Andres has the right idea that there's some more-subtle
variation in the test conditions, but (yawn) too tired to look
into it right now.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Binary search in ScalarArrayOpExpr for OR'd constant arrays
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Set access strategy for parallel vacuum workers