Re: pg_statio_all_indexes - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Hoksza
Subject Re: pg_statio_all_indexes
Date
Msg-id 18210304510.20060730210018@seznam.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_statio_all_indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Yes, you are right. I now tried to select from one table various amount of
records and when the amount exceeded some given number so the blks_hit begun
fall.

Thanks,
       David Hoksza

________________________________
30. července 2006, 20:24:33, napsal jste:

TL> David Hoksza <david.hoksza@seznam.cz> writes:
>> Hi, I'm not sure about the value idx_blks_hit of pg_statio_all_indexes
>> view. Is it total value of touched pages, or do I get total value when
>> I add idx_blks_read to it?
>> In other words - does idx_blks_hit cover also physical reads?

TL> I believe blks_hit is the number of page requests that were found in
TL> cache and hence did *not* require a read().  The other column is the
TL> number of page requests that *did* require a read().

TL>                         regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_statio_all_indexes
Next
From: "Dawid Kuroczko"
Date:
Subject: Re: Secure connections with changing ip addresses?