Re: unknown conversion %m - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: unknown conversion %m
Date
Msg-id 18196.1303965884@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unknown conversion %m  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: unknown conversion %m  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> What I'm thinking of doing is to set up something like:
>     #define PG_PRINTF_CHECK __printf__

BTW, gcc 2.95.3 documents "printf", and not "__printf__".
Suggest not including the underscores, since that's apparently a
johnny-come-lately spelling.  It's not like any of this construct
is even faintly portable to non-gcc compilers anyway ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: unknown conversion %m
Next
From: Dmitry Fefelov
Date:
Subject: Re: Fail to search in array, produced by subquery - is it a bug?