Re: configurability of OOM killer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: configurability of OOM killer
Date
Msg-id 18184.1202426707@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: configurability of OOM killer  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: configurability of OOM killer  ("Markus Bertheau" <mbertheau.pg@googlemail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:22:42PM +0100, Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
>> ....while we are at it -- one feature would be great for 8.4, an
>> ability to shange shared buffers size "on the fly".

> Shared memory segments can't be resized... There's not even a kernel
> API to do it.

Even if there were, it seems unlikely that we could reallocate shared
memory without stopping all active transactions, so it'd be barely less
invasive than a postmaster restart anyhow.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why are we waiting?
Next
From: "Gevik Babakhani"
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item:Allow to_date() and to_timestamp() accept localized month names