Re: [HACKERS] problems with pg_restore - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] problems with pg_restore
Date
Msg-id 18172.1058366499@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to problems with pg_restore  ("Kuhn, Dylan K (4520500D)" <Dylan.Kuhn@navy.mil>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] problems with pg_restore  (Andrew Biagioni <andrew.biagioni@e-greek.net>)
List pgsql-admin
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:03:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Given the current implementation, it seems like there are three possible
>> behaviors for COMMENT ON DATABASE when the database name isn't the same
>> as the current database:

> There's a fourth possibility:  ignore the command and issue a WARNING.

Hmm, that seems like a reasonable choice.  Anyone have an objection?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Kuhn, Dylan K (4520500D)"
Date:
Subject: Re: problems with pg_restore
Next
From: Andrew Biagioni
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] problems with pg_restore