Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace patch review - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace patch review
Date
Msg-id 18101.1087672121@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Tablespace patch review  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace patch review  (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
[ switching to pghackers for wider comment ]

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> By the way, I think that we should deny users the ability to create 
> tablespaces that begin with pg_.  Also, the existing ones should be 
> pg_global and pg_default.  That way, we have room to move if ever we 
> decide we want more system tablespaces.  It also makes it easier to dump 
> non-system tablespaces.

Seems like a reasonable suggestion to me.  Any objections?

BTW, another argument for this is that "default" is a reserved word.
I'd already noticed in testing that CREATE TABLE ... TABLESPACE default
doesn't work unless you double-quote "default".  Calling it pg_default
would avoid that annoyance.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: email browser?
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Tablespace patch review