Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two
Date
Msg-id 18045.1520370764@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 3/4/18 16:09, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> If you want to do this soon I can put out a Buildfarm Client release
>> fairly quickly.

> I think the dependency is mostly the other way around.  How quickly
> would build farm owners install the upgrade?

IIUC, the buildfarm script patch is only needed to avoid duplicate
tests.  So owners need only install it if they want to reduce wasted
cycles on their machines.  That being the case, it's only urgent to
the extent that the individual owner perceives it to be.  Some might
think it is so, so I'd like to see the BF release available before
we push the TAP test ... but we don't have to wait very long between.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning