Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE
Date
Msg-id 18004.1423099489@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE  (David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> The phrase "{INDEX | TABLE |..} name" seems to me indivisible as
> target specification. IMHO, the options for VACUUM and so is
> placed *just after* command name, not *before* the target.

> If this is right, the syntax would be like this.

> REINDEX [ (option [, option ...] ) ] {INDEX | TABLE | etc } name

> What do you think about this?

I think this is wrong and ugly.  INDEX etc are part of the command name.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup may fail to send feedbacks.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: binworld and install-binworld targets - was Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand