Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?
Date
Msg-id 1800068.1718292337@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?
List pgsql-hackers
Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm unsure if the documentation matches the code?
> " connect_timeout #
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/libpq-connect.html#LIBPQ-CONNECT-CONNECT-TIMEOUT>

> Maximum time to wait while connecting, in seconds (write as a decimal
> integer, e.g., 10). Zero, negative, or not specified means wait
> indefinitely. The minimum allowed timeout is 2 seconds, therefore a value
> of 1 is interpreted as 2. This timeout applies separately to each host name
> or IP address. For example, if you specify two hosts and connect_timeout is
> 5, each host will time out if no connection is made within 5 seconds, so
> the total time spent waiting for a connection might be up to 10 seconds.
> "
> The comments says that timeout = 0, means *Timeout is immediate (no
> blocking)*

> Does the word "indefinitely" mean infinite?
> If yes, connect_timeout = -1, mean infinite?

The sentence about "minimum allowed timeout is 2 seconds" has to go
away, but the rest of that seems fine.

But now that you mention it, we could drop the vestigial

>>         if (timeout < 0)
>>             timeout = 0;

as well, because the rest of the function only applies the timeout
when "timeout > 0".  Otherwise end_time (nee finish_time) stays at -1.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: adding pytest as a supported test framework
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: jsonpath: Missing Binary Execution Path?