Re: Some more information_schema issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Some more information_schema issues
Date
Msg-id 17868.1066354687@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Some more information_schema issues  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>> I notice that most of the references in the information_schema.sql are 
>> not schema-qualfied.

> They don't need to be, because the references will be resolved when the
> views are parsed during initdb.

On second thought, you do have a point with regard to those newly-added
SQL functions.  Names used within the texts of those functions need to
be fully qualified for safety.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Some more information_schema issues
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about debugger