> "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>> Tom - what's next? Do we want to roll RC3 with this ugly fix, or do we
>> want to look at a better fix right away?
> I think we want to look at a better fix right away; mainly because we
> need to test it to be sure that it really fixes the problem ;-).
> I will work on this today.
I have committed fixes that rearrange the code as I was envisioning.
Things still seem to work when building with -DEXEC_BACKEND on Unix,
but I'm not in a position to verify the Windows-specific code. Please
give it a try ASAP.
regards, tom lane
