Re: [HACKERS] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2
Date
Msg-id 17831.1151618468@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-patches
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes:
> I think it'd be good to put a big, fat WARNING in the log if we fire up
> an autovac to avoid an XID wrap, since it's an indication that the
> vacuuming scheme that's in place probably isn't good enough.

No, for nonconnectable databases it'd be expected behavior (given the
proposed patch).  Warn away if the db is connectable, though ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2