Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Date
Msg-id 17762.1505838601@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  ('Bruce Momjian' <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  ('Bruce Momjian' <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
"'Bruce Momjian'" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:22:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We don't normally release-note documentation changes.  If this
>> wasn't purely a documentation change, then I was probably in error
>> to decide it didn't need to be in the notes.

> It was purely a documentation change, but it was a documented change in a
> long-standing and popular practice of not using too many shared buffers
> on Windows, so I thought it wise to add it.

Well, if the intent of the note was to encourage people to raise
shared_buffers, it didn't do a very good job of that as written,
because I sure didn't understand it that way.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: 'Bruce Momjian'
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Next
From: 'Bruce Momjian'
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes