Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change
Date
Msg-id 1773241.1653441787@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-05-24 12:01:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> For back-patching into v14, we could put the new NodeTag type at the
>> end of that enum list.  The change in the inline GetMemoryChunkContext
>> is probably an acceptable hazard.

> Why would we backpatch this to 14? I don't think we have any regressions
> there?

Oh, sorry, I meant v15.  I'm operating on the assumption that we have
at least a weak ABI freeze in v15 already.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Assert name/short_desc to prevent SHOW ALL segfault
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial