Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local
Date
Msg-id 1772438.1672761756@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: perl 5.36, C99, -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow=compatible-local  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> It occurs to me that we should now be able to drop configure's
> probe for -Wno-compound-token-split-by-macro, since that was only
> needed to suppress warnings in the Perl headers.

... or not.  A bit of experimentation says that they still come out,
apparently because the warnings are triggered by *use* of relevant
Perl macros not by their *definitions*.  Oh well.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Is OpenSSL AES-NI not available in pgcrypto?
Next
From: "agharta82@gmail.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: Is OpenSSL AES-NI not available in pgcrypto?