Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Date
Msg-id 17711.1267163715@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?  (Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net>)
List pgsql-bugs
Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net> writes:
> Now, you've reminded me of something: That one or more versions of tar have trouble with very long file/directory
names 
> I've run into this with one of the source trees we've been working in - was it here in PostgreSQL? Could this be a
culprit? 

I believe we dealt with that, by renaming some files shorter.  It wasn't
anywhere near the docs files anyway.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Lou Picciano
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Next
From: Oleg Serov
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #4673: pl/PgSQL: Bug, when updating changed composite types.