Re: listening addresses - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: listening addresses
Date
Msg-id 17629.1080142179@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: listening addresses  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> How about "no socket created for listening" or some such?

> Or "no socket available for listening"?

"Created" seems better since it's a verb, and focuses attention on the
probability that we tried and failed to make a socket.  "Available" is
too passive; it seems to suggest that the problem is a kernel limitation
or some other outside force, when of course the problem is bogus
configuration parameters given us by the DBA.

But we've already spent far more time on this one message than is
justified ;-)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: listening addresses
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: introduce "default_use_oids"