Re: SET autocommit begins transaction? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?
Date
Msg-id 17607.1032386882@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> writes:
>>> Does turnning autocommit off enter you into a transaction?  Am I
>>> smoking something or does that seems broken?

> Tom, do you want to special case autocommit?  I think that would be OK.

No, I don't like that either ... in general I do not think SET's
behavior should vary depending on which variable is being set.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?
Next
From: Sean Chittenden
Date:
Subject: Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?