Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types
Date
Msg-id 17553.1191598940@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> 1. Why doesn't the subselect work?

Because x = ANY (SELECT y FROM ...) is defined by the SQL standard to
involve performing x = y at each row of the SELECT output.  There's
no wiggle room there.

The standard does not specify any meaning for x = ANY (not-a-SELECT)
and we've shoehorned some array behavior into that gap, but it's
completely different semantics.

> 2. Why does a function returning a polymorphic type have to have at
> least one polymorphic argument?

So that the parser can figure out what type a particular call is
supposed to return.

> 3. Why is a composite type with just one attribute not the same type as
> the attribute?

Why in the world would you expect these to be the same?  It'd be akin to
claiming that a one-element array is the same as the element type.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: default_text_search_config
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types