Re: Postgress and MYSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Anton.Nikiforov@loteco.ru |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Postgress and MYSQL |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1753530847.20040114110852@loteco.ru Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Postgress and MYSQL ("Bob Powell" <Bob@hotchkiss.org>) |
Responses |
Re: Postgress and MYSQL
|
List | pgsql-general |
Hello Bob! Everybody knows that PostgreSQL is better than MySQL and supports more features etc. But remember - the main issue of database systems now is web that is being build mainly by students that do not even know what database engines are made for. At least here (My second job is Instructor in Unix/Linux/etc.) and i know that the main thing that is required by students is Linux with apache and MySQL. And the strange thing - students are always starting learning from Network Administration or Linux in Enterprise course, but real administrators who is working with systems for 10-15 years are starting from Introduction into unix systems. Here in Russia almost all web design companies using MySQL, on all hosting systems owners asking to install MySQL for their users etc. MySQL is everywhere. So, who will work with PG? Only people registered here :)) Maybe a few more. So it is normal that MySQL beats PG on the market. I have Oracle, PostgreSQL servers, used to work with DB2 on AS/400 and personaly i know that PG is better than MySQL. But who will tell it to students who saw a computer twice and already think that they are administrators? :)))) Please do not kill me for this post - i like PG and working with PG and developing for PG, i was talking just about what happening around. To make PG known there should be more and more products that relay on PG. And this should be not Banking or other mission critical projects. It should be a simple forums, picture bases i do not know what but the things that should be installable for 3 minutes and working for years. Otherwise if PG is positioning itself as a DB system for huge and mission critical tasks - nobody here should think about MySQL that was simple and will be simple when PG is being installed for tasks where MySQL will never work and nobody will ever think it will. Regards, Anton BP> To whom it may concern: BP> I find the recent articles in various trade publications a little BP> disturbing due to the lack of PostgrSQL mention. I continue to see BP> articles about how IBM may be considering MYSQL for development an BP> open_source web database. BP> Why isn't PostgreSQL being considered or talked about by major industry BP> giants? As a DBA I know that Postgres is far superior to MYSQL but if BP> the industry directs it's energies towards open-source database this BP> coming year I think somehow PostgreSQL needs to be represented better. BP> Bob Powell BP> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- BP> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate BP> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your BP> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
pgsql-general by date: