Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?
Date
Msg-id 17520.1043626316@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Can we revisit the thought of PostgreSQL 7.2.4?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Request for qualified column names  (Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce, I've finished digging for stuff that seems to be appropriate to
back-patch for 7.2.4.  Do you have time to generate the release notes
and brand the release?  Attached are the CVS commit messages for all
the changes in that branch since 7.2.3.
        regards, tom lane


2003-01-26 18:16  tgl
* src/backend/commands/user.c (REL7_2_STABLE): Back-patch fixes todetoast pg_group.grolist.

2003-01-26 18:09  tgl
* src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c (REL7_2_STABLE): Back-patchfixes to ensure t_ctid always has correct value (prevents
someinstancesof 'No one parent tuple' VACUUM error, and perhaps worsethings).
 

2003-01-26 17:33  tgl
* src/: backend/utils/adt/datetime.c,test/regress/expected/timestamp.out,test/regress/expected/timestamptz.out
(REL7_2_STABLE):Back-patchfix for alphabetization mistakes in datetime token tables.
 

2003-01-21 14:51  tgl
* src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c (REL7_2_STABLE): Back-patch fixto ensure pg_clog updates are not only written but
sync'edbeforewe consider the checkpoint to be done.
 

2003-01-21 14:41  tgl
* src/backend/utils/adt/geo_ops.c (REL7_2_STABLE): Back-patch fixesfor integer overflows in circle_poly(),
path_encode(),andpath_add() --- from Neil Conway.  Also, repair recently-detectederrors in lseg_eq(), lseg_ne(),
lseg_center().

2003-01-21 14:38  tgl
* src/backend/commands/vacuum.c (REL7_2_STABLE): Back-patch fix forVACUUM being confused by SELECT FOR UPDATE of tuple
thatwaspreviously outdated by a transaction that later aborted.  Also,prevent VACUUM from being called inside
function.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for objections: put back OIDs in CREATE TABLE
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows Build System