Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes:
> On 12/02/10 15:10, Allan Kamau wrote:
>> Therefore I am looking for a solution that contains
>> "last-accessed-time" data for these objects, especially for the
>> functions and maybe the triggers.
> Ah, sorry - misunderstood. There's not any timestamp kept. As you can
> imagine, it would be a cost you'd have to pay every time you accessed an
> object.
> The best you can do is to turn on statement logging, parse the logs to
> see what objects are used and then keep those and their dependencies.
Or: remove some objects, run your test case, see if it succeeds.
Repeat as needed.
regards, tom lane
