Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> * How about naming the parameter wal_level instead of wal_mode? That
>> would better convey that the higher levels add stuff on top of the lower
>> levels, instead of having different modes that are somehow mutually
>> exclusive.
> That works for me.
What happens in the future if we have more options and they don't fall
into a neat superset order?
regards, tom lane
