Re: I just got it: PostgreSQL Application Server -- a - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From pgsql@mohawksoft.com
Subject Re: I just got it: PostgreSQL Application Server -- a
Date
Msg-id 17387.24.91.171.78.1087213227.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: I just got it: PostgreSQL Application Server -- a  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
>>The "PostgreSQL Enhanced Server" (How's that name? Maybe we call it
>> Zerver
>>and use PEZ?) idea is how to take the excellent core of PostgreSQL and
>>productize it in much the same way distributions take the Linux kernel
>> and
>>may a GNU/Linux system.
>>
>>
>>
> It would seem to me that this is more correct in the commercial space.
> Of course I am biased but
> what you are talking about sounds a whole lot like RedHat Enterprise
> versus Fedora etc....

No, I don't think I agree. It does not need to be "Commercial" as it is
similar to Apache Jacarta too.

If you are going to do a complex project with PostgreSQL, you sort of have
a lot of construction ahead of you. Yea, it is a great SQL engine, but to
build a high speed web site, or virtually any complex project, you will
need a lot of add-ons.  Rather than have everyone duplate the effort of
finding the extensions, why not have a project with all this stuff
installed. AFAIK, and correct me if I'm wrong, having functions installed
doesn't affect performance.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] Compiling libpq with
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Releasing 7.4.3 ...