Re: dblink_build_sql_update versus dropped columns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: dblink_build_sql_update versus dropped columns
Date
Msg-id 17377.1276541697@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dblink_build_sql_update versus dropped columns  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: dblink_build_sql_update versus dropped columns  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> I didn't even think people were using those functions for many years
> since I never heard any complaints. I'd say better to not backpatch
> changes to logical ordering, but FWIW the attached at least fixes the
> immediate bug in head and ought to work at least a few branches.

[squint...]  This doesn't appear to me to fix the problem.  You really
need the query-construction loops to track logical and physical numbers
separately.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Typo in plperl doc ?
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: dblink_build_sql_update versus dropped columns