Re: Regression on 7.1.2 fails 17/76 - is it up to date? - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Regression on 7.1.2 fails 17/76 - is it up to date?
Date
Msg-id 17361.994125408@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Regression on 7.1.2 fails 17/76 - is it up to date?  (Allan Engelhardt <allane@cybaea.com>)
List pgsql-novice
Allan Engelhardt <allane@cybaea.com> writes:
> I'm asking, because my installation reports: "17 of 76 tests failed, 1
> of these failures ignored."  This seems an awful lot for a recent
> download..

Your installation seems to be *seriously* broken.  Don't even consider
using it till you find out what the problem is :-(.  Looking at the
detailed regression diffs would be a good start; also read
http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.1/postgres/regress.html

As of now I believe the abstime test should be expected to show about
two lines of differences, because it had an ill-considered comparison
between 'current' and '30 June 2001' :-(.  Otherwise you should not see
any differences that you can't explain away as one of the phenomena
mentioned on the aforesaid webpage.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: ghaverla@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca
Date:
Subject: Re: Regression on 7.1.2 fails 17/76 - is it up to date?
Next
From: Lukas Ertl
Date:
Subject: Backup question