Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress
Date
Msg-id 17352.1316445568@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> One thing I am trying to avoid here is needing to check the system clock 
> after every buffer write.

On machines where gettimeofday is slow (and last I heard there were
still lots of them), any such thing would be a disaster
performance-wise.  I'm still afraid to add more gettimeofday's into the
query parse/plan/execute code path, even though it would greatly ease
the problem of figuring out whether re-planning is worthwhile.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Susanne Ebrecht
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CUDA Sorting