Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view)
Date
Msg-id 17309.1180721575@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view)  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updatinganupdatable view)  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I'm sorry guys but I don't agree this is a TODO item.
...
> Also, methinks we should have agreed behaviour before we make something
> a TODO item.

There is a whole *lot* of stuff in the TODO list that does not have a
consensus solution yet.  You should not imagine that it's gospel.

At the same time, it'd be better if this item were worded more like
"investigate this issue" rather than presupposing a particular
form of answer.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Florian G. Pflug"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts