Re: OFFSET and LIMIT - performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: OFFSET and LIMIT - performance
Date
Msg-id 17300.1183054758@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to OFFSET and LIMIT - performance  ("Jan Bilek" <bilekj@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: OFFSET and LIMIT - performance  (David Wall <d.wall@computer.org>)
Re: OFFSET and LIMIT - performance  (Kaloyan Iliev <kaloyan@digsys.bg>)
List pgsql-general
"Jan Bilek" <bilekj@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm using PGDB with JDBC. In my app i need to select only portion of all =
> available rows. I know i can do it two ways:
> 1. I can use OFFSET and LIMIT SQL statements or
> 2. I can select all rows and then filter requested portion in Java.

> My question - Does the second way significantly affect performance =
> especially when used with JDBC?

Network transmission costs alone would make the second way a loser.

Large OFFSETs are pretty inefficient because the backend generates and
discards the rows internally ... but at least it never converts them to
external form or ships them to the client.  Rows beyond the LIMIT are
not generated at all.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] i need a rad/ide open source for work with postgresql
Next
From: David Wall
Date:
Subject: Re: OFFSET and LIMIT - performance