Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
Date
Msg-id 17295.1550858087@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:43 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> We are certainly not supposed to go DROP SCHEMA on the temp namespaces, ...

> Actually, I think that's supposed to work.

If it's in active use by any session (including your own), that's not going
to have nice consequences; the owning session will have the OID in
static storage, and it will be unhappy when that OID becomes dangling.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: speeding up planning with partitions