Re: [HACKERS] Sum aggregate calculation for single precsion real - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Sum aggregate calculation for single precsion real
Date
Msg-id 17282.1487179846@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Sum aggregate calculation for single precsion real  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think that's more or less the argument Konstantin is in fact making.
> Whether it's a good argument or a thin one is a value judgement.
> Personally, I find it somewhere in the middle: I think the way it
> works now is reasonable, and I think what he wants would have been
> reasonable as well.  However, I find it hard to believe it would be
> worth changing now on backward compatibility grounds.

I agree with that conclusion.  It might have been reasonable to change
it fifteen years ago when we changed the integer sum() implementations,
but I think doing so now would make more people unhappy than it would
make happy; or at least, there's little reason to think the reverse
is true.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?