Re: [GENERAL] Large object corruption during 'piped' pg_restore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Large object corruption during 'piped' pg_restore
Date
Msg-id 17244.1295638088@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Large object corruption during 'piped' pg_restore  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Bosco Rama <postgres@boscorama.com> wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So I'm not sure whether to fix it, or leave it as a known failure case
>>> in old branches. �Comments?

>> As an end user there is one area of the DB that I want to work correctly
>> 100% of the time and that is the dump/restore tool(s).

> Yeah, I lean toward saying we should back-patch this.

Fair enough, I'll go do it.  I just wanted to hear at least one other
person opine that it was worth taking some risk for.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: RangeTypes