Re: [HACKERS] partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: [HACKERS] partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Date
Msg-id 1711d370-b578-7f8d-f4b5-f8662e5808fb@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/05/2017 02:29 PM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
> I'm going to hold the partition table regression changes for a
> separate patch and include some ORDER BY fixes. Will post tomorrow
>
> In the meantime, attached are the latest and greatest patches.

I'm going to push the attached in a few hours unless there is any
additional discussion. As stated above we'll do the regression changes
in a separate patch once that is sorted. I used Tom's approach and
comment wording for 0001a.

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GSoC] Push-based query executor discussion
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] No-op case in ExecEvalConvertRowtype