Re: bool_plperl transform - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: bool_plperl transform
Date
Msg-id 16cbcd48-d5cb-72a5-5447-7714caff238e@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to bool_plperl transform  (Ivan Panchenko <wao@mail.ru>)
Responses Re[2]: bool_plperl transform  (Wao <wao@mail.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/29/20 4:55 PM, Ivan Panchenko wrote:
> Hi,
> While using PL/Perl I have found that it obtains boolean arguments
> from Postgres as ‘t’ and ‘f’, which is extremely inconvenient because
> ‘f’ is not false from the perl viewpoint.
> So the problem is how to convert the SQL booleans into Perl style.
>  
> There are 3 ways to do this:
>
>  1. make plperl automatically convert bools into something acceptable
>     for perl. This looks simple, but probably is not acceptable as it
>     breaks compatibility.
>  2. try to make some trick like it is done with arrays, i.e. convert
>     bools into special Perl objects which look like ‘t’ and ‘f’ when
>     treated as text, but are true and false for boolean operations. I
>     am not sure that it is possible and reliable.
>  3. make a transform which transforms bool, like it is done with
>     jsonb. This does not break compatibility and is rather
>     straightforward.
>
> So I propose to take the third way and make such transform. This is
> very simple, a patch is attached.
> Also this patch improves the plperl documentation page, which now has
> nothing said about the transforms.
>  
>


Patch appears to be missing all the new files.


cheers


andrew



-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG?] postgres_fdw incorrectly updates remote table if it hasinherited children.
Next
From: Krasiyan Andreev
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] distinct aggregates within a window function WIP